| Haiti @Unocha.org |
With the amount of traumatizing disasters and events going
on around the world, the need for humanitarian groups that focus on providing
the people stuck in these situations with whatever they may need- food, clean
water, and medicine being some of the most in demand products- is only growing.
With the rise in demand of help over the last few decades, the world has seen
many groups step up to the plate and help. However, there are many issues and
barriers that humanitarian groups have to face in order to fulfill their
purpose.
In The Crisis Caravan,
Linda Polman- who is a Dutch author that specializes on humanitarian aid and
intervention- points out the many issues that comes with being involved in
humanitarian aid that are caused not only by the many hostile and corrupt
groups that are usually located in a lot of developing countries, but also by
the humanitarian group themselves.
![]() |
| South Sudan soldiers stealing UNICEF aid @NYDailyNews.com |
The biggest problem that these groups face are the fact that
they are most often stopped by rebel groups who won’t let them pass into the
territories without some sort of “payment”. Polman says that the percentage of
the aid that the groups want changes with every warlord. Some will take as little-
relatively little, I suppose- as 15 percent, while others will take as high as
80. Also, when dealing with these negotiations, the humanitarian groups have to
be very careful at how they approach the situation. The groups deal with many
different types of people- who often have conflict with one another. As the six
ICRC workers- who helped the Lendus people despite what their enemies the Hema
people wanted- demonstrated, crossing the wrong people can result in death.
The aid usually ends up not reaching the people it was
donated for in most situations. The warlords use it to supply their own armies.
However, even when the aid does reach the designated village, the humanitarian
groups find that they have created their own problems. Polman says that there
are some cases of groups finally getting to the victims, and realizing that
they do not have the resources that are needed the most, like adequate medical
care. Because these groups usually
operate under the slogans that every little bit helps, they are usually left
with completely useless resources to give to needy people.
Humanitarian aid has also turned into an industry, with many
NGOs fighting to receive the money needed to fund their missions. On page 177
of The Crisis Caravan, Polman says
that “Aids are businesses dressed up like Mother Teresa”. I believe that she uses
that phrase to describe modern humanitarian aid because they have turned into
businesses, and it has become an industry where every dollar and every mission
that is ‘successfully’ completed means that there is a better opportunity that
they can continue doing what they need to do. However, this leads to a lot of
corruption within NGOs. Because they’re so dependent on donations and grants, they
have to keep a relatively clean image to the public. This leads to a lot of
NGOs hiding the fact that- a good portion of the time- the aid is falling into
the hands of the people who are arguably causing so much of the disarray in
these regions.
That image doesn’t make it to the public, though, and the image that NGOs are putting out- through media- is a more ‘saintly’ one, like Mother Teresa (which even her image is debatable in some circles, but for the most part, she’s regarded as a saint).
NGOs are seen as the unbiased, neutral light in war torn
countries, but that doesn’t mean that they are without fault. Polman says in
the afterword that she doesn’t know if there is a solution to making
humanitarian aid more successful, but there are a few places that we can start.
![]() |
| UN meeting discussing humanitarian aid @MFA.gov.tr |
First, we have to start holding journalists that cover these
groups more responsible for telling a complete story about the conditions
within these groups. Polman says that journalists, despite being trained to get
a well-rounded story with many different sources, usually just take whatever
NGOs say about their missions with very little question. This only contributes
to the misconceptions about NGOs and humanitarian aid in war-torn countries.
If we can get that to happen, then the public can be more knowing- they’d have to care, first, but if they’re donating, then they probably already somewhat care- of who they’re donating to, and can put more pressure onto NGOs to handle their operations better. The public knowing could also help push pressure onto governments around the world to set up systems for assessing the overall performance of NGOs since there seems to be no real standards for how NGOs should be operating. This allows the agencies to control themselves, and it’s being shown that they aren’t feeling any need to reform they’re practices.
It would be ideal to live in a world where no one is in need
of humanitarian aid, but it would also be naïve to sit around and wait for it
to happen instead of trying to fix the current issues that are preventing
humanitarian aid from working. I believe that with a little more regulation
from the government, a little more coverage from the media, and a little more
urgency from the public, we can collectively come together and solve these
issues.


No comments:
Post a Comment